| 
          
         | 
        
          
            <<  
             ^ 
              >>
          
          
            
              
                Date: 1998-05-26
                 
                 
                Nix Gutes: Mitch Kapor über Bill Gates
                
                 
-.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- 
                 
                
      q/depesche 98.5.27.2 
 
Nix Gutes: Mitch Kapor über Bill Gates 
 
Der Gründer von Lotus & nunmehrige High Tech Investor über die Zukunft von Micro/soft. 
Hauptvorwurf: mangelnde soziale Verantwortlichkeit. 
Vorraussage: Zerschlagung. 
 
 
 
High-Tech Hypocrisy About Government 
By MITCHELL KAPOR  
May 26, 1998 
 
 
CAMBRIDGE, Mass. -- In the mid-1980's, during my tenure at Lotus, I was, I 
believe, the first  person to publicly compare Microsoft to Standard Oil. 
Both companies sought and used  monopoly control over a new industry 
critical to the nation's economy. And both were headed by men -- John D. 
Rockefeller Sr. and Bill Gates -- who would stop at virtually nothing to 
gain what  they sought. Back then no one took the comparison seriously -- 
except Bill Gates himself, who made  it clear to me how irate he was about 
it.  
  
Like Gates, I believe in and have profited from the free market. But I'm 
also a technorealist, which  means that unlike many of my colleagues in the 
high-tech industry, I don't automatically see  Government as the enemy of 
technological progress. Such views are all too fashionable in Silicon 
Valley, where the prospect of Government intervention causes a bad case of 
heartburn.  
 
What my colleagues need to see is that the market cannot work unless our 
society sets rules of play  and enforces them. Microsoft has benefited from 
the stability and opportunities provided by those  rules, but it has been 
flouting them as well. The antitrust suits filed last week against 
Microsoft are  therefore regrettable but necessary.  
 
Despite all of Gates's talk about the right to innovate, his company uses 
its power to limit consumer  choice and impede a free marketplace. Only the 
Government has the ability to take on Microsoft,  and the Justice 
Department's antitrust chief, Joel Klein, has done his homework. He's a 
pragmatist,  not a crusader.  
 
Klein understands that the real threat to entrepreneurial innovation is 
Microsoft's anticompetitive  arrogance. Great discoveries in computing 
often come from small start-up companies. Yet with  Microsoft's dominance, 
vast areas of the product market -- including but hardly limited to basic 
applications like word processors and spreadsheets -- are barren zones 
where venture capitalists and  entrepreneurs fear to tread because 
Microsoft has staked a claim or is seen as likely to do so. It is a  sad 
but telling fact that in the high-tech field, virtually no business plan 
will be financed today without  a convincing answer to the question of what 
is to be done about competition from Microsoft.  
 
The Government also recognizes that Microsoft's dominance will only 
intensify as the Internet  becomes an integral part of mainstream culture. 
The browser war is just the beginning. Microsoft  claims droit du seigneur 
in any area of computing that becomes strategically important -- voice 
recognition, home appliances, auto navigation and so on.  
  It's unfortunate that Microsoft is so aggressively self-interested that 
an external check is necessary. I  would prefer to live in and help create 
a society in which self-regulation makes antitrust suits  unnecessary. But 
until such a business ethos prevails, we must rely on other means.  
 
Ultimately, the extent of the Government-mandated reform may depend on 
Microsoft's willingness to  begin acting like a more socially responsible 
industry leader. To the extent that the company remains  recalcitrant, it's 
likely that radical solutions will gain favor.  
 
 
The most drastic action, of course, would be to break Microsoft up into a 
series of Baby Bills,  separating operating systems from applications and 
from content and services. Today that seems like  overkill, but in the 
coming years, short of a sincere change of heart by Gates, it may well 
become the  preferred solution. 
 
-- Mitchell Kapor, the founder of Lotus Development Corporation, is an 
investor in high-tech  start-ups. 
 
relayed by Declan McCullagh. tnx 
 
-.-.- --.-  -.-.- --.-  -.-.- --.- 
TIP 
Download free PGP 5.5.3i (Win95/NT & Mac) from Arge Daten 
http://keyserver.ad.or.at/pgp/download/
                   
 
-.-.- --.-  -.-.- --.-  -.-.- --.-
    
                 
- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- 
                
edited by  
published on: 1998-05-26 
comments to office@quintessenz.at
                   
                  
                    subscribe Newsletter
                  
                   
                
- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- -.-. --.- 
                
                  <<  
                   ^ 
                    >> 
                
                
               | 
             
           
         | 
         | 
        
          
         |